MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242177730 · doi:10.5354/0719-3769.1970.18886

Coacción económica y tratados desiguales

2012· article· es· W4242177730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios Internacionales · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenunciationNormativeCapitalismPolitical scienceCoercion (linguistics)InterdependenceRelevance (law)International relationsProduct (mathematics)Economic JusticeDeclarationEconomic globalizationPolitical economyLawEconomic systemSociologyGlobalizationEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this century, the economic dimensions of international agreements have taken on special relevance. Socialist theory has denounced as "unequal" those Treaties and Agreements that were the product of the domination of capitalism. International relations are essentially an economic interrelation, a vast network of commercial interdependencies that brings countries together in a close material union. But these material ties have been unparalleled in the creation of normative precepts that transform this economic interrelation into moral progress. The States have not agreed on the fundamental principles of economic justice that must be accepted for the historical evolution of the peoples to follow a peaceful course. However, the denunciation of economic coercion made in the Vienna Declaration can contribute to reducing these differences in values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it