MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242199054 · doi:10.1109/dac.2003.1219139

Statistical estimation of leakage-induced power grid voltage drop considering within-die process variations

2004· article· en· W4242199054 on OpenAlexaff
I.A. Ferzli, F.N. Najm

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)Power gridVoltageVoltage dropLeakage (economics)GridLeakage powerComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringMechanical engineeringTransistorMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transistor threshold voltages Vth have been reduced as part of on-going technology scaling. The smaller Vth values feature increased fluctuations due to process variations, with a strong within-die component. Correspondingly, given the exponential dependence of leakage on.Vth, circuit leakage currents are increasing significantly and have strong within-die statistical variations. With these currents loading the power grid, the grid develops large voltage drops, which is an unavoidable background level of noise on the grid. We develop techniques for estimation of the statistics of the leakage-induced power grid voltage drop based on given statistics of the circuit leakage currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451)Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207