MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242204218 · doi:10.47886/9781888569988.ch17

Burbot: Ecology, Management, and Culture

2008· book-chapter· en· W4242204218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Fisheries Society eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographySubsistence agriculturePopulationResource (disambiguation)HabitatAgency (philosophy)EcologyEnvironmental protectionFisheryAgricultureArchaeologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract.—Native burbot <em>Lota lota </em>in the transboundary Kootenai basin (spelled Kootenay in Canada) were once abundant and provided an important subsistence, social, sport, and commercial fishery for people in the states of Idaho and Montana, USA and the province of British Columbia, Canada. However, due to changes in the ecosystem over the last half century (dam and levee construction, habitat alteration, nutrient loss, and fish community composition shift), the burbot population in the Kootenai basin collapsed. Through the Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative, the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho facilitated a collaborative process to prepare and implement a conservation strategy to restore the burbot population. The Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative includes representation from the county, municipal, and tribal governments, as well as a diverse group of individuals representing business, agricultural, social, cultural, and conservation interests and federal and state agency participants. By building consensus through the development of the conservation strategy, actions have been identified and agreed upon that will guide rehabilitation of the burbot population and the habitat upon which it depends, while maintaining a strong level of community support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Fisheries Society eBooksSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207