MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242218969 · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1190-1

Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation

2019· book· en· W4242218969 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Franziska Görmar, Thilo Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueNew geographies of Europe · 2019
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversität LeipzigCardiff UniversityTartu ÜlikoolUniversitatea Babeș-BolyaiUniversity of OxfordSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaBoston College
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceProcess (computing)Civil societyPolarization (electrochemistry)Political economyEconomic systemEconomicsComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This open access book provides an understanding of the underlying process of polarisation and related regional and local policies in Europe. It shows the existing potentials and limits of individuals, economic, political and civil society actors to respond to polarisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew geographies of EuropeSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207