Crafting the Machinery of Municipal Rule: The Board of Police in Nineteenth Century Brockville, Upper Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis traces the coordination, configuration and operation of municipal government in Brockville, Upper Canada, between 1830 and 1836.By focusing on how governing occurred and what was involved in governmental projects, rather than who governed, it presents new insights into the processes that constituted a form of rule in a nineteenth century town.Contrary to presenting a narrative of rationalization, it argues that manner, etiquette and prestige were essential to the machinery of local government, as targets of regulation and as characteristics of the mode of operation.The problem of how the concept of democracy, and the idea of local government, are translated into political practices is explored through an investigation of the agents and arrangements that were fashioned to form the institution of municipal government.Scholarly attention has been directed to the modern incorporated municipality, which owes much of its framework to the Municipal Corporations Act of 1849.Instead, this thesis focuses on its Upper Canadian predecessor, the board of police.Boards of police significantly changed the ways in which the administration and regulation of local affairs occurred.This thesis argues that local government was only possible through the coordination of a political space, populated by agents who had to govern themselves and govern others.It explores how governing through boards of police required crafting the machinery of municipal rule.Nero, to tenth century London where 'bellmen' rung a 'curfew bell', warning townsfolk to 'take care' of their candles during the night.It became apparent that an important aspect of the regulation of fire involved the development of quasi-professional and professional 'fire engineers' who operated as agents of incorporated municipalities, a process that involved something resembling what Cynthia Cockburn (1977) has termed instances of 'the local state'.Cockburn's 'local state' concept is useful as a starting point inasmuch as it attempts to capture local specificity while paying attention to broader, state level, relations of power.Such a vision would view instances of preventive practices as occurring alongside and within sets of broader concerns, capital accumulation or
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".