MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242256191 · doi:10.2320/matertrans.mpr2015902

PREFACE

2015· article· en· W4242256191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATERIALS TRANSACTIONS · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joining, whether at macro-, micro-, or nano-scale, is used to fabricate almost all manufactured products in industrial sectors, such as electrical, electronic, medical, aerospace, automotive and nuclear, providing mechanical coupling and support, electrical connection or insulation, environmental protection, etc.While microjoining has already become one of the most critical technical prerequisites in manufacturing of micro-devices and micro-systems, new challenges continue to emerge for technology advancements to support faster and more reliable fabrication, continuing miniaturization, and cost reduction.On the other hand, nanojoining is now developing rapidly and is expected to become a key technology in commercial success of nano-devices and nano-systems.Based on the background, the 2nd International Conference on Nanojoining and Microjoining was held at Hotel Seeblick, Emmetten, Switzerland, December 710, 2014, following the very successful first NMJ meeting in Beijing in 2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it