MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242297638 · doi:10.1080/02722011.2011.571451

Carter F. Hanson,<i>Emigration, Nation, Vocation: The Literature of English Emigration to Canada</i>Denyse Baillargeon,<i>Babies for the Nation: The Medicalization of Motherhood in Quebec, 1910–1970</i>Freeman M. Tovell,<i>At the Far Reaches of Empire: The Life of Juan Francisco de la Bodega y Quadra</i>Alastair W. Gillespie (with Irene Sage),<i>Made in Canada: A Businessman's Adventures in Politics</i>Brian Bow,<i>The Politics of Linkage: Power, Interdependence, and Ideas in Canadian–American Relations</i>Calvin Helin,<i>The Economic Dependency Trap: Breaking Free to Self-Reliance</i>Helen E. Ross, ed.,<i>Letters from Rupert's Land, 1826-1840: James Hargrave of the Hudson's Bay Company</i>Michael Byers,<i>Who Owns the Arctic?: Understanding Sovereignty Disputes in the North</i>

2011· article· en· W4242297638 on OpenAlexaffabout
Oana Godeanu‐Kenworthy, Anne Griffin, David Eric Jessup, Ronald V. Kalafsky, Kim Richard Nossal, Chris Paci, Patricia Rogers, Jessica M. Shadian

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMétis National CouncilQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationMedicalizationSociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emigration, Nation, Vocation is a sophisticated exploration of the place of settler emigration in the ideological spectrum of imperialism, as viewed through the lenses of literary representations o...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207