MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242305837 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-03/1/22

Atmospheric Plasma-Sprayed Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Varying Cathode Microstructures

2015· article· en· W4242305837 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Harris, Joel Kuhn, Olivera Kesler

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureYttria-stabilized zirconiaAnodeCathodeSolid oxide fuel cellSolution precursor plasma sprayElectrolyteOxideMetallurgySpark plasma sinteringThermal sprayingChemical engineeringCeramicComposite materialCubic zirconiaElectrodeThermal barrier coatingCoating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) use less expensive materials than traditional anode-supported or electrolyte-supported SOFCs. The active layers of a metal-supported SOFC can be manufactured by plasma spraying without the need for high-temperature sintering. Plasma spraying is a rapid-fabrication process that is scalable for large cell areas and for mass production. Porous ferritic stainless steel (Sanergy HT, Sandvik, Sweden) supports were manufactured from powders by pressing and sintering pellets. The active cell layers consisted of a composite nickel - yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) anode, a YSZ electrolyte, and a La0.6­Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (LSCF) – Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (SDC) cathode. Plasma spraying produces unique microstructures, as the cell layers are built up by the rapid solidification of molten (or semi-molten) splats. These microstructures were tailored by adjusting the plasma spray process parameters and the ingredients in the feedstock. Dense electrolytes were made using a high-power plasma, a very high torch pass speed (to minimize the plasma heat impulse to the substrate), and a feedstock consisting of YSZ suspended in a mixture of water, ethanol, and ethylene glycol. Cathodes with four different microstructures were produced by varying the plasma spray parameters and mixing carbon or starch-based pore forming agents into the ceramic feedstock powders. Resultant microstructures are shown in Figure 1. Electrochemical performances of metal-supported button cells with varying cathode microstructures were measured. At 750°C, the cells had open circuit potentials of up to 1.057 V and peak power densities as high as 562 mW/cm². Electrochemical impedance spectra were measured at an operating point of 0.7 V, varying the cathode gas with different air-nitrogen mixtures. With 100% air as the cathode gas, the lowest cell polarization resistance was 0.29 Ωcm² at 750°C. Equivalent circuit modeling was performed to analyse how the cathode microstructure affected the cell performance. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207