MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242378515 · doi:10.3917/ecofi.102.0099

La finance coopérative rurale en Chine : histoire, développement et perspectives

2011· article· fr· W4242378515 on OpenAlexaff
Chen He, Shengzu Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d économie financière · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsNational Capital Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La finance coopérative rurale, s’adressant aux exploitants agricoles de petite taille, est l’un des trois piliers de la finance rurale de la Chine. Au cours de son histoire, elle a connu trois formes d’organisation : le crédit coopératif rural, les fonds coopératifs ruraux et les fonds mutuels ruraux. En raison des changements de l’environnement du marché et des politiques, mais surtout de l’abandon des principes de la coopérative, les crédits coopératifs sont devenus des institutions financières commerciales et les fonds coopératifs ont fini par disparaître de l’histoire. Les pratiques des fonds mutuels sont en train d’établir un modèle de développement futur pour la finance coopérative rurale, celui de l’intégration de la coopérative financière et de la coopérative économique. Classification JEL : G2, N25, P32, P34, R51.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d économie financièreSame topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207