MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242417195 · doi:10.1139/z99-217

Does primiparity affect the efficiency of converting energy to offspring production in the guinea-pig?

2000· article· en· W4242417195 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joachim Künkele

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsOffspringBiologyLactationLitterCaviaReproductionAnimal sciencePregnancyEndocrinologyEcologyGuinea pig

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In small mammals the reproductive performance of first-time breeders is of great relevance to fitness. However, young primiparous mothers reproduce generally less successfully than multiparous ones. One constraining factor may be inefficiency of novice breeders in converting energy to offspring production. To test this hypothesis I investigated the energy cost of gestation and lactation in the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus). I compared mothers' offspring production (growth of pups), body mass, and energy intake, as well as the solid-food intake of their pups (during lactation) and energy expenditure (resting oxygen consumption) between young primiparous, old primiparous, second-litter multiparous, and third-litter multiparous females. Young primiparous females showed significantly lower offspring production than multiparous females. For older primiparous females the level was intermediate. Both young and older primiparous females showed a lower efficiency of converting energy to offspring production than their multiparous conspecifics. Parity affected lactation most strongly. Part of the inefficiency of primiparous guinea-pig mothers can be explained by the lower contribution to the energy budget made by their offspring from independent consumption of solid food.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207