MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4242430124 · doi:10.21203/rs.2.12449/v1

Developing an experimental necrotic enteritis model in turkeys - the impact of Clostridium perfringens, Eimeria meleagrimitis and host age on frequency of severe intestinal lesions

2019· preprint· en· W4242430124 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon P. Hardy, Sylvie L. Benestad, Inger Sofie Hamnes, Torfinn Moldal, Bruce David, John R. Barta, Jean-Michel Répérant, Magne Kaldhusdal

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige UniversitetNorges ForskningsrådNorturaMonash UniversityOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsClostridium perfringensEnteritisEimeriaHost (biology)MicrobiologyHost responseBiologyClostridiumImmunologyMedicineBacteriaImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Little information exists concerning the pathogenesis, immunity, microbiota or experimental reproduction of turkey necrotic enteritis. Necrotic enteritis in turkeys and chickens differ with regard to important aspects. The objective of this study was to contribute to the development of in vivo experimental models of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Results: A four tier (0-3) scoring system with clearly defined degrees of severity of macroscopic intestinal lesions was developed, based on 2312 photographic images of opened intestines from 810 B.U.T. 10 or B.U.T. Premium turkeys examined in nine experiments. Loss of macroscopically recognizable villi in the anterior small intestine was established as the defining lesion qualifying for a score 3 (severe intestinal lesions). The developed scoring system was used to identify important factors in promoting high frequencies of turkeys with severe lesions: a combined Eimeria meleagrimitis and Clostridium perfringens challenge, challenge at five rather than three weeks of age, the use of an Eimeria meleagrimitis dose level of at least 5 000 oocysts per bird and finally, examination of the intestines of 5-week-old turkeys at 125 to 145 hours after Eimeria meleagrimitis inoculation. Numbers of oocysts excreted were not influenced by Clostridium perfringens inoculation or turkey age. Three different outcome variables (median lesion score, frequency of severe lesions and frequency of mucosal pseudomembranes/ulcers/depressions) were compared regarding ability to differentiate statistically between effects of dissimilar combinations of Clostridium perfringens inoculation and turkey age at challenge. Frequency of severe lesions was the superior outcome variable in this comparison. Conclusions: This study represents a first and major step forward in the development of in vivo experimental models of necrotic enteritis in turkeys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→