MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase II study of oral ENMD-2076 administered to patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

2014· article· en· W4242436944 on OpenAlexaff
Herbert H. Loong, Martin E. Blackstein, Abha A. Gupta, David Hogg, Lindsay Culala, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, Stephanie Baker, Lisa Wang, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectSarcomaSoft tissue sarcomaInternal medicineTrabectedinPhases of clinical researchGemcitabinePazopanibResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsProgressive diseaseSurgeryOncologyClinical trialCancerGastroenterologyChemotherapyPathologySunitinib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10528 Background: The use of angiogenic and Aurora kinase inhibitors has been shown to abrogate tumor growth in STS. ENMD-2076 is an oral Aurora A and angiogenic kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated single-agent activity in STS cell lines and inhibition of sarcoma growth for a patient in a phase 1 clinical trial setting. Methods: This is a single-center, open-labeled phase II study of ENMD-2076 in advanced STS pts treated with ≤1 line of prior therapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Pts were commenced on 275mg daily dose (on a 28-day cycle. Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed by CTCAE (4.0). Radiographic or clinical tumor measurements occurred every 2 cycles (RECIST 1.1). Results: 10 pts were enrolled from 2/2013 – 11/2013 and evaluable for efficacy. Median age is 58 yrs (41 – 72). Male: Female 1:9. Histology: Leiomyosarcoma / pleomorphic sarcoma / angiosarcoma: 7/2/1. Pts received the following prior systemic therapies: doxorubicin/gemcitabine/others: 2/3/5. At time of abstract submission, median follow-up is at 7 months (2-12). 3 pts continue on study. Median number of cycles administered per pt = 2 (1-8). 2 pts had confirmed partial response (PR) and 1 pt with confirmed stable disease (SD) of > 6 months. Clinical benefit rate (PR+SD >6 months) was 30%. Median OS has not been reached. Median PFS at 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.2 – not reached). ENMD-2076 has generally been well tolerated with primarily grade 1 and 2 adverse events (AEs). Specifically, drug-induced hypertension occurred in 6 pts (grade 1-2: 4 pts, grade 3: 2 pts). Proteinuria, all grade 1-2, occurred in 6 pts. Other drug related grade 3 or 4 AEs include (pts): elevated transaminases (1), leukopenia (1), and diarrhea (1). 1 pt developed Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) presenting as grade 4 loss of consciousness at Cycle 1 Day 15 required ICU admission. Full neurological recovery was attained after cessation of treatment. Conclusions: ENMD-2076 has shown activity in patients with advanced STS, with meaningful clinical benefits and a side effects profile typical of this class of agent. PRES is a rare but fully reversible side effect of ENMD-2076. Clinical trial information: NCT01719744.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→