MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242437290 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.619

The therapeutic ratio is preserved for radiotherapy or cisplatin treatment in BRCA2-mutated prostate cancers

2013· article· en· W4242437290 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Danny Vesprini, Steven A. Narod, John Trachtenberg, Juanita Crook, Farid Jalali, John Preiner, Srikala S. Sridhar, Robert G. Bristow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsSouthlake Regional Health CenterPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchWomen's College HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersProstate Cancer Canada
KeywordsMedicineCisplatinRadiation therapyToxicityOncologyInternal medicineProstate cancerTherapeutic indexPARP inhibitorCancer researchChemotherapyPoly ADP ribose polymerasePharmacologyCancerDrugBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancers in patients with a mutation in BRCA2 have earlierdisease onset and an aggressive course, often necessitatingthe use of systemic therapy. However, these tumours are DNArepair-defective and could respond favourably to Parp inhibitors orDNA-damaging agents, depending on the therapeutic ratio (ratio oftumour response to normal tissue toxicity). We describe 3 patientstreated with precision radiotherapy or cisplatin who respondedfavourably to both agents, yet did not suffer undue toxicity. Wereview the concept of treating such patients with agents that areselectively toxic to repair-deficient tumours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207