Analysis of Northern bottlenose whale pulses and associated reflections recorded from the Gully Marine Protected Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Gully Marine Protected Area (MPA) is a large submarine canyon at the edge of the Scotian Shelf, south of Nova Scotia. A resident population of northern bottlenose whales are known to occur in the Gully throughout the year, and the canyon provides important foraging grounds for the population. Bottom-mounted Autonomous Multichannel Acoustic Recorders (AMAR) were deployed in the Gully for ten days in in March 2010 (sampling rate = 375 ksps) and two days in October 2011 (sampling rate = 128 ksps). Bisonar pulses produced northern bottlenose whales (likely used to echolocate prey) were recorded consistently throughout these AMAR deployments. The swept FM characteristics of the northern bottlenose whale pulses recorded were consistent over both years, and both data sets contained clear pulse reflections from bottom clutter or prey targets. In this paper we provide a description of the northern bottlenose whale pulses recorded in the Gully and make recommendations on short-time Fourier transform parameters for analysis of the pulses. A description of the pulse reflections is also provided, based on analysis of the reflection patterns using short-time Fourier transforms and by matched filtering with the direct arrival from the whales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".