MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242475831 · doi:10.4000/sjep.193

11. Friedens- und Sicherheitspolitik

2005· article· de· W4242475831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSchweizerisches Jahrbuch für Entwicklungspolitik · 2005
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman Security and Defense Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGynecologyArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seit Beginn des neuen Jahrtausends misst die Schweizer Aussenpolitik dem Begriff der menschlichen Sicherheit besondere Bedeutung zu. In dieser Hinsicht hat der Bund die Strategie 2004-2007 für seinen Einsatz im Bereich der Antipersonenminen aufgearbeitet. Dazu fand im November und Dezember 2004 in Nairobi die 1. Konferenz zur Überprüfung der Ottawa-Konvention über das Verbot dieser Minen statt.In Bezug auf Rüstungskontrolle und Abrüstung definierte die Schweiz ihre Politik im September 2004 in einem Bericht. So setzt sie sich weiter für die chemische Abrüstung ein, insbesondere in Russland. Die Schweiz spielt auch eine aktive Rolle in der Partnerschaft für den Frieden, besonders im Bereich der Informationstechnologien.In der Friedenspolitik engagierte sich die Schweiz in den neuen europäischen Streitkräften in Bosnien-Herzegowina (EUFOR), welche die Stabilitätskräfte der NATO (SFOR) im Dezember 2004 ablösten. Unterstützt durch eine Resolution des UNO-Sicherheitsrats haben diese Streitkräfte eine militärische wie eine zivile Mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it