MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242476134 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.14535930.v1

Self-sustained Marangoni Flows Driven by Chemical Reactions

2021· preprint· en· W4242476134 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anne‐Déborah C. Nguindjel, Peter A. Korevaar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersProvincial Health Services Authority
KeywordsMarangoni effectReagentChemistryChemical reactionSurface tensionFlow (mathematics)Pulmonary surfactantChemical physicsChemical engineeringMechanicsThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Out-of-equilibrium chemical systems, comprising reaction networks and molecular self-assembly pathways, rely on the delivery of reagents. Rather than via external flow, diffusion or convection, we aim at self-sustained reagent delivery. Therefore, we explore how the coupling of Marangoni flow with chemical reactions can generate self-sustained flows, driven by said chemical reactions, and – in turn – sustained by the delivery of reagents for this reaction. We combine a photoacid generator with a pH-responsive surfactant, such that local UV exposure decreases the pH, increases the surface tension and triggers the emergence of a Marangoni flow. We study the impact of reagent concentrations and identify threshold conditions at which flow can emerge. Surprisingly, we unraveled an antagonistic influence of the reagents on key features of the flow such as interfacial velocity and duration, and rationalize these findings via a kinetic model. Our study displays the potential of reaction-driven flow to establish autonomous control in fuel delivery of out-of-equilibrium systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207