MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242476297 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-02/7/722

Garnet-Based Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li-S Batteries

2019· article· en· W4242476297 on OpenAlexaff
Chengtian Zhou, Venkataraman Thangadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials sciencePolysulfideWettingIonic conductivityLithium (medication)ElectrochemistryDissolutionElectrodeCeramicConductivityChemical engineeringFast ion conductorNanotechnologyComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries have emerged as one of the most promising post LIBs technologies with a remarkably high theoretical energy density and abundance of elemental sulfur. Nonetheless, there are several problems associated with Li-S batteries such as safety hazard due to lithium dendrite formation and fast capacity decay due to polysulfide dissolution effect.1 Employment of solid-state electrolytes is a promising strategy to address those issues. Among different solid-state Li-ion electrolytes, Li-garnet attracts a lot of attention as it has a wide electrochemical window (> 6 V vs. Li/Li+), and high ionic conductivity (~ 1 mS cm-1) at room temperature. However, the application of garnet is hampered by its interfacial resistance against electrodes.2 In order to the reduce the interfacial area specific resistance (ASR) of Li/garnet interface, we devised a surfactant-processed interlayer for ceramic electrolytes (SPICE) method which can uniformly deposit a layer of ZnO onto the garnet surface. This process improves the wetting of Li and reduces the interfacial ASR to 10 Ω cm2 at room temperature.3 Stable Galvanostatic cycling of Li/garnet/Li at current densities up to 0.5 mA cm−2 was conducted, which presents a compelling method to solve the Li/solid electrolyte interface problem. Another strategy we applied is incorporating garnet into polymer matrix to fabricate a flexible hybrid electrolyte. Polymer-based electrolytes possess low interfacial resistance due to its intimate contact with electrodes.4 The hybrid electrolyte merging the merits of garnet and polymer has been successfully employed in all-solid-state Li-S batteries operating at room temperature. Toward improving the energy density of the battery, we are working on tuning the cathode structure to effectively load more sulfur active materials. In this presentation, the SPICE method to tailor the interfacial resistance and the performance of all-solid-state Li-S batteries based on hybrid electrolyte will be discussed. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Chung, S.; Zu, C.; Su, Y. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751-11787. Han, X.; Gong, Y.; Fu, K.; He, X.; Hitz, G.; Dai, J.; Pearse, A.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.; Rubloff, G.; Mo, Y.; Thangadurai, V.; Wachsman, E.; Hu, L. Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 572-579. Zhou, C.; Samson, A.; Hofstetter, K.; Thangadurai, V. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2018, 2, 2165-2170. Zhou, C.; Bag, S.; Thangadurai, V. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2181-2198.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207