MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

International Conference on Spectral Lines Shapes

2019· article· en· W4242487507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine (geometry)Library scienceScope (computer science)PhysicsEngineering physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

List of Scope, Invited Speakers, International Programme, Local Organising Committee are available in this pdf. 24th International Conference on Spectral Line Shapes (ICSLS 2018) It is commonly accepted that the Europhysics Study Conference on Spectral Line Broadening and Related Topics which was held in Meudon in 1973 was the first in the current series of ICSLS meetings. The ICSLS is a bi-annual conference series and to date has been held at alternating European and North-American conference venues. It is proposed that it move to other continents in future. The most recent venues were Paris, France (2004), Auburn, USA (2006), Valladolid, Spain (2008), St. John’s, Canada (2010), St. Petersburg, Russia (2012), Tullahoma, Tennessee, USA (2014) and Torun, Poland (2016). The 2018 (24th) ICSLS conference took place in Dublin during June 17 - 22, 2018. The ICSLS covers a broad range of topics related to spectral line shape studies, including: line shapes of atomic and molecular transitions in neutral gaseous mixtures, single and multi-photoionisation ionisation processes, high and low temperature plasmas, clusters and helium droplets, nanophotonic processes, spectroscopy of stellar atmospheres and interstellar media, spectroscopy of planetary atmospheres and exoplanets, cold atoms and molecules, collision-induced spectra, processes in laser fields, innovative techniques of line shape applications for diagnostic purposes and fundamental studies with narrow optical resonances along with applications in e.g., industrial, environmental, medical and all other potential domains of interest. The conference includes a mix of invited talks, talks selected from submitted abstracts and poster presentations. List of Conference Photograph and Sponsors are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2140.144

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvanced optical system designFrench-language works237,207