Promoting Liberty through Universal Benevolence in Elizabeth Hamilton’s <i>Translation of the Letters of a Hindoo Rajah</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Translation of the Letters of a Hindoo Rajah (1796), Elizabeth Hamilton champions attention to family and immediate neighbours, yet she also advocates universal benevolence, which she aligns with local affections against selfishness. Her praise for the British in India suggests the difficulties of this alliance, for her love for her deceased brother, an East India Company employee, apparently distorts the understanding of the East that it inspires her to seek. She implicitly warns her readers of her own weakness, however, by showing her rajah progress from loyal naïveté to disillusionment, and she asks her readers to follow him in recognizing British faults. Satirizing British cruelty in the Western Hemisphere, in the East, and at home, she contrasts this cruelty with the universal benevolence that the British owe to all people, and she seeks to inspire such benevolence by engaging readers’ sympathy for characters unlike themselves. Defining people of all nations as brethren and neighbours, Hamilton especially warns her women readers against too narrow a devotion to their immediate families, encouraging them instead to expand their service into the public realm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".