MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242518161 · doi:10.1787/9789264217294-38-en

Switzerland

2014· book-chapter· en· W4242518161 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsSpace policyPublic administrationSupporterSpace (punctuation)Agency (philosophy)Political scienceUnit (ring theory)Administration (probate law)GeographyRegional scienceLawSociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Switzerland has been active in European space activities since the early 1960s. It was a founding member of the European Space Agency (ESA) and co-chairs the ESA Council at ministerial level since 2012. The country takes a wide-ranging interest in space, while specialising in specific segments. Having longstanding capacities in space science, it has been a supporter of European launcher programmes from the beginning and has developed industry capabilities in this sector. Over time Switzerland has built up capacities in exploration and exploitation of space infrastructure, where applications and services are becoming increasingly important. Switzerland is also one of 10 countries supporting the European Southern Observatory (ESO) which operates two major observatories in Chile. The Swiss Space Office (SSO) is the administrative unit responsible for planning and implementing Swiss space policy, as defined by the Federal Council. It is under the direct authority of the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD eBooksSame topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207