MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Large-scale flood models in watersheds with several lakes and reservoirs

2020· preprint· en· W4242560799 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gaia Olcese, Christopher Sampson, Gu nol Chon, Pascale M. Biron, Thomas Buffin B langer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiConcordia University
FundersMinistry of Environment
KeywordsFlood mythScale (ratio)Hydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceCalibrationHydrological modellingWater levelFlood forecastingStatistical modelComputer scienceGeologyCartographyGeographyStatisticsClimatologyMathematicsMachine learningGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of recent flood events in Canada affecting areas around lakes and reservoirs have highlighted the need to explicitly represent such features in large scale flood models. Water level fluctuations in lakes are traditionally modelled using detailed hydrological models designed – as far as possible – to represent the actual physical processes that take place. This approach, while appropriate for local-scale studies in data-rich areas, is not applicable for large-scale flood modelling where data availability for model calibration and validation is often severely limited. This paper explores two methodologies, one statistical and one physically based, designed to approximately predict the increase in the water level of lakes in Quebec (Canada) using only limited morphological information about the lakes and the estimated discharge entering the water body during a flood event. Of the two methods, the statistical approach proved to be the most applicable to a large-scale modelling framework as it exhibited lower errors whilst being considerably easier to implement in a semi-automated modelling chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→