MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4242577400 · doi:10.1017/9781108676373.009

Conclusion

2020· book-chapter· en· W4242577400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashutosh Bhagwat

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)DemocracyPolitical sciencePolitical economySociologyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American democracy finds itself in a strange place in the first quarter of the twenty-first century. On the one hand, the country suffers from bitter, partisan divisions as reflected in the fact that adults who identify themselves with a political party increasingly demonstrate strong loyalty to their own party, and even stronger distaste for the other party. A 2017 Gallup poll reveals, astonishingly, that large majorities of self-identified Democrats and Republicans strongly prefer that their children marry someone from their political party – while a similar majority support same-sex marriage, and a much larger majority accept interracial marriage. 2 At the same time, huge numbers of Americans are utterly disengaged from politics, so much so that they do not even bother to vote.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2350.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicSocial Policy and Reform Studies→French-language works237,207→