MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242581654 · doi:10.1002/9780470061589.fsa478

Psychopathy Checklists

2009· other· en· W4242581654 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen D. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychopathyPsychopathy ChecklistChecklistPsychologyClinical psychologyAntisocial personality disorderPsychiatryPredictive validityMental healthTest (biology)Poison controlInjury preventionMedicineSocial psychologyMedical emergencyPersonality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Hare Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised or PCL‐R and the Screening Version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised or PCL:SV are observer ratings scales designed to assess the lifetime presence and severity of a wide range of symptoms of psychopathy in adults. PCL‐R is intended specifically for use in correctional offenders and forensic psychiatric patients, whereas PCL:SV is also intended for use in civil psychiatric patients and community residents. Research indicates PCL‐R and PCL:SV have good psychometric properties, including inter‐rater, structural, and test‐retest reliabilities. The tests have good concurrent validity with respect to other procedures for assessing psychopathy and robust predictive validity with respect to serious antisocial behavior, including violence. PCL‐R and PCL:SV are often used by forensic mental health professionals as part of comprehensive risk assessments, although evaluators should be aware of some important limitations of the tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley Encyclopedia of Forensic ScienceSame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207