Back Cover: Phys. Status Solidi A 206/5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The back cover picture of this issue refers to the article entitled ‘Preparation and luminescent properties of Eu2+‐activated glass ceramic phosphor precipitated with β‐Ca2SiO4 and Ca3Si2O7’ by T. Nakanishi and S. Tanabe (pp. 919–922). The paper is a contribution from the International Conference on Optical, Optoelectronic and Photonic Materials and Applications (ICOOPMA) held in Edmonton, Canada in July 2008. The two left‐most pictures show the cathodoluminescence mapping images of the as‐made glass ceramic (GC) and a GC sample heat‐treated at 1050 °C, in which the secondary phase of red phosphor was precipitated around the primary crystal phase emitting green luminescence by post ceramization. The three sample pictures show the color variation of the photoluminescence from the GC phosphors of the same composition ceramed at different temperatures. The chromaticity diagram on the right hand side shows the change in the color coordinates through the ceramization (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.592 | 0.304 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".