Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thomas Hobbes, ao enunciar, no Leviatã, que "a riqueza e prosperidade de todos os membros individuais são a força" da república, toma o termo riqueza sob dois sentidos distintos: o de uma coleção de benssentido substantivoe o de poder de obtenção de bens futurossentido transitivo.Embora o último, ao longo dos séculos desde Hobbes, tenha-se eclipsado pelo primeiro, a importância fundamental do conceito de crédito no jogo das trocas sociais aponta que uma análise da riqueza que enfatize seu caráter transitivo, em sua relação com a expectativa quanto ao tempo futuro, é necessária para que se possa entender, em toda a sua complexidade, a atribuição de valor aos bens, bem como para realinhar a análise econômica à finalidade da Política.A riqueza, enquanto signo de expressão do poder, refaz, assim, o entendimento da ideia de pobreza, que deixa de denotar essencialmente um estado de escassez material, para ser entendido sobretudo como estado de miséria e servidão.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".