Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2011), "Editorial Board", Sarat, A. (Ed.) Special Issue Social Movements/Legal Possibilities (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 54), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. ix. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2011)0000054003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Special Issue Social Movements/Legal Possibilities Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Copyright page List of Contributors Editorial Board Two spinning wheels: Studying law and social movements Decolonizing the law: LGBT organizing in Namibia and South Africa Social movements and the state's construction of identity: The case of Muslims in France Rejecting rights: The disability critique of physician assisted suicide Social movements lashing back: Law, social change and intra-social movement backlash in Canada Protest arrests and future protest participation: The 2004 republican national convention arrestees and the effects of repression Convincing elites, controlling elites After 9/11: Guantánamo and the mobilization of lawyers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".