MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242680511 · doi:10.4000/eccs.483

Avant-Propos

2015· article· fr· W4242680511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Françoise Le Jeune

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A l'heure où les élections fédérales d'octobre 2015 se préparent au Canada, le numéro 78 de la Revue Etudes Canadiennes/ Canadian Studies a choisi de de dresser un état des lieux des neuf ans de mandat des Conservateurs.Sous le titre « Nine years and counting » ou « Presque dix ans déjà : le nouveau Canada de Stephen Harper », Laurence Cros nous propose une introduction faisant le point sur ces neuf années depuis l'arrivée au pouvoir des Conservateurs en 2006, et quatre ans après la victoire qui leur a donné un gouvernement majoritaire.Elle présente également les problématiques des six auteurs dont nous avons sélectionné les textes ici.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207