A framework for mining hybrid automata from input/output traces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automata-based models of embedded systems are useful and attractive for many reasons: they are intuitive, precise, at a high level of abstraction, tool independent and can be simulated and analyzed. They also have the advantage of facilitating readability and system comprehension in the case of large systems. This paper proposes an approach for mining automata-based models from input/output execution traces of embedded control systems. The models mined by our approach are hybrid automata models, which capture discrete as well as continuous system behavior. Specifically this paper proposes a framework for analyzing multiple input/output traces by identifying steps like segmentation, clustering, generation of event traces, and automata inference. The framework is general enough to admit multiple techniques or future enhancements of these steps. We demonstrate the power of the framework by using some specific existing methods and tools in two case studies. Our initial results are encouraging and should spur further research in the domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it