MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242733466 · doi:10.4324/9781315613451-23

Black, White and Brown on the Dance Floor: The New Meanings of Panjabiyat in the Twenty-first Century

2016· book-chapter· en· W4242733466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMusic Education and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceWhite (mutation)ArtVisual artsArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between music, ethnicity and identity is nowhere as apparent as in popular and academic discussions of Bhangra including those in anthropology, sociology and studies of culture, religion, music and dance, in addition to the print and electronic media. Bhangra scholarship examines it largely in relation to the identity politics of South Asian diasporic formations in Britain, Canada and North America in which Bhangra becomes the site for the production and contestation of hybrid, in-between diasporic identities by second-and third-generation youth of Indian/South Asian origin. even though the euphoric declarations of ‘the Asian youth finding their voice’ of the late 1980s and early 1990s1 gradually gave way to wry cynicism in the unpacking of the new politics of ethnicity and identity in subsequent examinations of South Asian youth subcultures,2 Bhangra continues to be theorized through an ethnic lens even in more recent studies.3 With its heavy investment in the politics of race, ethnicity, language, gender, caste, region and religion, it is not surprising that aesthetic or musical analysis of Bhangra texts has been marginalized to ideological considerations or the focus on uses and gratifications that is found in media and cultural studies. In this chapter I wish to investigate the production of Bhangra with the objective of examining the consolidation of ethnic identity in multicultural nations and societies in the wake of globalization and to focus on the benefits and dangers of the return of ethnicity in the identity discourses in the global village. The rhetoric of cultural difference in multiculturalism is seen as emerging from, and replicating, the older politics of race, colour, caste and religion in addition to building a new politics of ethnicity in which a mobilization of ethnicities fills us with multicultural hope but also makes us uncomfortable as participants in a neo-orientalizing world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic Education and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207