Legitimizing the Artist. Manifesto Writing and European Modernism 1885-1915
Bibliographic record
Abstract
sagacious variety of narrative techniques, which confer on the fundamental nature of each time period and place, moment and experience a distinguishing light, tex- ture and shade.In its overall structure, the novel follows a circular movement, so common in many Italian-Canadian narratives, following Nickys journey from his troubled inner-self to the world of his ancestors-so distant in time and place and experience-and back.Nicky's experiences are narrated in the first person at the beginning and end of the novel, which allows for an effective layering of intimate and social dynamics.Between these rwo parts set in the present, the transcription of the Tolomesi vìììa^ers story by Nick)' is inserted as the adaptation of his grandfather's storytelling.This meta-linguistic artifice of recording and re-elaborating the grandfa- ther's narration in the grandson's own words allows the author to overcome inevitable hurdles originating from a linguistically realistic rendition of the elder's story, so that metaphorically the narration lets the voices of the young and the elderly overlap and, in the end, blend into one consciousness.The voice of the grandfa- ther becomes the voice of the grandchild and vice versa, in a rare moment of empathy and communion.Recensioni waning decades of the nineteenth-century as new social, pohtical and economic dynamics emerged to subvert Romanticism, and the potent negative effects it had on the artists and the sense of their role and mission.One immediate consequence of this turn of events was that artists had to acknowledge that the "Halo " which they sported with pride since before the rise of Modernity (one can think of Petrarch's coronation as poet laureate) had not only been challenged but had fallen by the wayside, ushering thus a many-sided crisis in the rapport art/world.For
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".