MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Quiz

2003· article· en· W4242758706 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph F. Fitzgerald, Riccardo Troncone, Kannan Ramaswamy, Douglas H. Jamieson, Geoffrey K. Blair, David M. Israel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiverticular Disease and Complications
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColostomySurgeryAbdomenPouchChest radiographMucocelePelvisAbscessAbdominal painRadiologyRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 9-year-old boy, known to have Crohn disease, presented to the emergency room with a one-week history of increasing, colicky abdominal pain. He was diagnosed at four years of age with severe perianal and rectal disease. His disease was refractory to extensive medical management, and he required a diversion sigmoid colostomy and the establishment of a Hartmann pouch at seven years of age because of persistent anal stenosis and severe dyschezia. In addition to his abdominal pain, he reported the passage of flatus, but no stool, into his colostomy bag. His vital signs were stable; he was apyrexial and had a normal urine analysis. On examination, his abdomen was protuberant with a 15 by 12 cm mass in the hypogastric region extending down into the pelvis. The colostomy site in the left flank appeared healthy. Anal inspection revealed extensive scarring, and no anal orifice was readily identified. Imaging included an abdominal radiograph (Fig. 1), abdominal and pelvic sonography (Fig. 2), and retrograde colon study via his colostomy.FIG. 1. No Caption AvailableFIG. 2. No Caption AvailableWhat is the most likely diagnosis? A. Colostomy stenosis and obstruction B. Pelvic abscess C. Rectal mucocele D. Distended bladder due to outlet obstruction Answer: C. Rectal Mucocele The mucosal lining of a Hartmann's pouch secretes mucus, which must drain or it will accumulate over time. Inflammation, scarring and epithelialization of the anal canal obstructed the drainage in this case, causing a mucocele, which progressively enlarged. The abdominal radiograph indicated a soft-tissue mass arising from the pelvis, displacing bowel superiorly and to the right. Sonography demonstrated a markedly dilated hollow viscus arising from the deep pelvis and extending up to the left hypochondrium. There was no obvious connection to the stoma site. The mass was causing mild, left-sided hydronephrosis. Retrograde enema via the colostomy filled a normal caliber colon. The anus was probed open under general anesthesia and 1100 ml of mucus was evacuated. A Penrose drain was left across the anus to maintain patency. Comment: Mucoceles are commonly associated with the appendix and cranial sinuses. Rectal mucoceles are rare. The first reported pediatric case was an extraluminal pelvic mucocele in a patient with an imperforate anus following an endorectal pull-through operation with incomplete mucosal excision (1). There are case reports of rectal mucoceles following Hartmann's procedure for ulcerative colitis, and secondary to high anal sphincter tone following spinal trauma (2,3). Mucoceles have developed in defunctioned colon after pull-through surgery due to stenosis and retraction of the colonic stump (4,5). Scarring of the mucus fistula, or failure to creat a mucus fistula are other described contributing factors. In our patient, obstruction of the isolated distal colon was caused by severe, long-standing anorectal Crohn disease which caused scarring, stricture and epithelialization of the anal orifice. Treatment requires effective drainage or removal of the mucus-producing epithelium. This case illustrates a rare but interesting complication of Crohn disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1760.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicDiverticular Disease and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207