MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Safe Space

2017· other· en· W4242812620 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Mountz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Encyclopedia of Geography · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarassmentMeaning (existential)HarmSpace (punctuation)QueerTerm (time)Physical spaceSociologyEpistemologyGender studiesPsychologySocial psychologyGeographyLinguisticsPhilosophyCartographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safe space has been used by human geographers writing in the subdisciplines of feminist, queer, critical, and health geographies. Until recently, the term was rarely defined but instead used loosely to refer to physical locations where individuals and groups could go to be free from physical harm and harassment, and safe in self‐expression. The term has recently received more sustained attention, with efforts to critique and reconceptualize its meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Encyclopedia of GeographySame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207