MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242818560 · doi:10.5964/ejop.v2i4.287

Second Anniversary

2006· article· en· W4242818560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mihaela Chraif, Vlad Petre Glăveanu

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope’s Journal of Psychology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownloadCitationLicenseLibrary scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Second Anniversary Authors Mihaela Chraif EJOP Editor Vlad Glaveanu EJOP Editor Abstract No abstract available. HTML Article info Impact Citations How to Cite License Published at 30. November 2006 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v2i4.287 Issue: Vol. 2 No. 4 (2006) Section: Editorial Share: Z Chraif, M., & Glaveanu, V. (2006). Second Anniversary. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v2i4.287 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 International License. PlumX Dimensions Views: Total Abstract HTML 123 109 14 Downloads: Download data is not yet available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope’s Journal of PsychologySame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207