MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Second Home Tourism and Agriculture in Rural Areas: Examining the Effects of Second Homes on Agricultural Resources in Northern Iran

2019· article· en· W4242856722 on OpenAlexaff
Fazileh Dadvar-Khani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rural Development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismAgricultureRural areaBusinessRural tourismGeographyPerceptionNatural resourceEconomic growthSustainable developmentSocioeconomicsTourism geographyEconomicsPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Second home tourism leads to new economic opportunities for local communities, and presents challenges for existing economic sectors in rural areas such as agriculture and l ivestock; it also fosters differing perceptions about the impact of appropriate development paths within rural areas. Despite the economic importance of second home tourism and its profound and often negative effects on the agriculture, no focused research of phenomenon has yet been conducted in Iran. The study aims to investigate second-home tourism in Iran with special reference to the perceptions of its positive and negative effects amongst second homeowners and local residents in the rural areas. The data were collected from 60 local household residents and 60 second homeowners randomly chosen. The data were first gathered through questionnaire, which was then used to analyse the second home tourism impacts on agriculture from the perception of tourism stakeholders. The research proves that uncontrolled second home development negatively affects natural attractions and agricultural resources in mountainous areas of Babol district, and overall northern Iran. Thus, there is more conflict existing between the two industries rather than synergy. Thereby, controlling second home tourism is one of the key factors for sustainable rural and agricultural development in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rural DevelopmentSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207