MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4242863639 · doi:10.4095/306539

Newmarket Till aquitard: optimum grain packing with a pore-filling calcite-rich cement

2018· report· en· W4242863639 on OpenAlexaffabout
B A Kjarsgaard, D R Sharpe, R D Knight, D A J Stepner, H A J Russell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCalciteGeochemistryAquiferFeldsparMorainePlagioclaseMineralogyQuartzGeomorphologyGlacial periodGroundwaterGeotechnical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newmarket Till is a stony, sandy (38%) silty (~47%) diamicton, which is of variable thickness (~1 - 69 m) and of widespread distribution in Southern Ontario. The Newmarket Till has unusually high densities (2.2 - 2.4 g/cm3); elevated seismic velocities (Vp ~2600 m/s) determined by downhole geophysical studies are characteristic and the Till can be traced across the region as a seismostratigraphic marker. As the Till is highly indurated and has low permeability, it forms a regional aquitard that confines underlying aquifers, and is also a basal aquitard for overlying aquifers (e.g. Oak Ridges Moraine). Given the high sand content of this diamicton, the low permeability and indurated nature is surprising, and could be resultant from over-consolidation due to glacial loading, presence of a secondary cement, or both processes. Recent observations from drill core and surficial sampling transects illustrate that Newmarket Till is not always cemented, but the observation of residual cement on pebbles indicates it was potentially formerly cemented. Our new studies indicate that the matrix of the Dummer moraine (adjacent to and south of the Shield - Paleozoic boundary and to the north of the Newmarket Till) is mineralogically and geochemically equivalent to Newmarket Till, and we thus suggest the Dummer Moraine is a very stone- to boulder-rich equivalent of the Newmarket Till. The matrix mineral assemblage of the Till (in decreasing abundance) is quartz, calcite, K-feldspar, plagioclase, dolomite, amphibole and clinopyroxene; these grains are comminuted and range in size from ~2000 ?m to ~2 ?m, leading to optimum packing, and potentially over-consolidation. The intra-grain matrix is exceptionally fine (<1 ?m, typically 0.25 - 0.50 ?m) and not resolvable by optical methods. Higher resolution SEM and FE-SEM backscattered electron and secondary electron images of the intra-grain matrix reveals a complex pore filling cement. The minerals comprising the secondary cement are a challenge to analyze due to their very fine grain size and composition. Semi-quantitative EDS analyses indicate a calcite (CaCO3) cement with minor phyllosilicates, as confirmed by XRD on the clay-silt and clay fractions. The calcite cements the silt- to sand-sized mineral grains and larger clasts, and result in the Newmarket Till being highly indurated and of low permeability. The timing and process of the initial cementation event is currently being evaluated; we also note that in the vadose zone the Till becomes uncemented (i.e. the original calcite cement dissolves out).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→