Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hugh Selwyn Mauberley (1920) is Pound's most sustained London poem, in his own words “distinctly a farewell” to the city he had come to in 1908 with such high hopes, but now departed in a mood of some bitterness and regret. The poem was also, Pound wrote to John Quinn, a portrait of “today”, the culmination at this point of his attempt to write modern verse with a modern content ( EP/JQ , 195). As commentators have regularly reported, the poem chronicles moments in artistic history from the Pre-Raphaelites and the nineties, and their legacy in the Edwardian period, directly naming or alluding to a number of writers and artists, including Flaubert, Rossetti, Swinburne, Victor Plarr, Ernest Dowson, Lionel Johnson, Selwyn Image, Max Beerbohm, Arnold Bennett, and Ford Madox Ford. In addition, it refers indirectly to the First World War poets and to the vorticist sculptor Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, killed in action in June 1915. But none of this, it has to be said, is of “today” if we understand this to designate the moment of composition in 1919–20. The poem includes nothing of Pound's “Contacts and Life,” in the words of the poem's preferred subtitle, associated with imagism or – aside from the possible reference to Gaudier-Brzeska – the vorticist movement; nothing to evoke Wyndham Lewis, T.S. Eliot or Joyce, and no reference to Pound's involvement in a series of “little magazines” in the period 1913–20 or to the important figures who influenced his thinking such as Allen Upward, A.R. Orage, Ernest Fenollosa and Major C. H. Douglas. The most “contemporary” aspect of the poem, in the sense that this was what occupied Pound in the late 1910s, is its interest in music or of verse to be sung, especially in the twin poems “Envoi” (dated 1919), modeled on Edmund Waller's “Go Lovely Rose!” and “Medallion,” the last poem in the second sequence, titled and dated “Mauberley (1920).”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.565 | 0.413 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".