Singlet Oxygen Generation in Classical Fenton Chemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Fenton reaction, the Fe-catalyzed conversion of hydrogen peroxide to reactive oxygen species (ROS) was discovered more than a century ago. It occurs widely in nature because of the ubiquity of Fenton reagents, i.e., Fe and H2O2, and ROS in environmental and biological systems; however, its mechanisms and the identity of the ROS generated under varying conditions have remained controversial. The widely accepted mechanism is that of successive oxidation and reduction of Fe2+ and Fe3+ by hydrogen peroxide to form ·OH and O2-·, respectively, where ·OH is implicated as the primary oxidant. However, the formation of high-valent Fe4+=O species has also been implicated. Herein, by systematically dissecting the contributions of various ROS species generated in the classical Fenton reaction by using specific ROS traps and scavengers, we identified that singlet oxygen (1O2) is the main ROS from pH 4–7. In contrast, although ·OH is produced in measurable quantities, it was not a major contributor to the oxidation of organic molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".