MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242924466 · doi:10.4095/295683

Cartes topographiques : les éléments de base

2014· report· fr· W4242924466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les cartes topographiques établies par Ressources naturelles Canada (RNCan) offrent des renseignements détaillés sur un secteur donné et sont utilisées dans plusieurs contextes, notamment la préparation aux situations d'urgence, l'aménagement urbain, l'exploitation des ressources et l'arpentage, ainsi que pour des activités comme le camping, le canotage, les raids sportifs, la chasse et la pêche. Ce guide est conçu pour aider les utilisateurs à comprendre les éléments de base d'une carte topographique. Il offre un aperçu des concepts relatifs à la cartographie et contient des conseils sur l'utilisation des cartes topographiques, des explications sur les termes techniques de même que des exemples de symboles utilisés pour représenter les caractéristiques topographiques sur les cartes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.020
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207