MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242928725 · doi:10.4000/estampe.631

15 000 pages, 4 300 textes, 600 auteurs

2015· article· fr· W4242928725 on OpenAlexaff
Rémi Mathis

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles de l estampe · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNorth African History and Literature
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Nouvelles de l’estampe ont désormais une longue histoire. Ce 250e numéro est celui de sa formule imprimée qui a succédé à la formule multigraphiée, plus artisanale, que Jean Adhémar et Paul Prouté avaient lancée en 1963 et dont Anthony Griffiths a retracé l’histoire dans notre n° 246 (printemps 2014), à l’occasion de son cinquantenaire, fêté en 2013.Ce 250e numéro a donc été précédé d’une autre centaine avant sa reprise sous une forme éditée et illustrée en janvier 1972, qui se poursuit ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4820.325

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles de l estampeSame topicNorth African History and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207