MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242931054 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/30/1987

(Invited) SiGe Applications in Automotive Radars

2016· article· en· W4242931054 on OpenAlexaff
W. Liebl, Josef Boeck, Klaus Aufinger, D. Manger, Walter Hartner, B. Heinemann, Rudolf Lachner

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterojunction bipolar transistorBiCMOSBipolar junction transistorRadarBall grid arrayCMOSElectrical engineeringTransistorEngineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An overview of the SiGe technologies used at Infineon Technologies for radar applications will be given. The production of bare-die chips started in 2009 using the bipolar technology B7HF200. Since 2012 packaged MMICs in an embedded wafer level ball grid array (eWLB) are available. Process challenges and solutions for radar chips in an eWLB package are presented. Examples of commercial SiGe radar chips in production are shown. Furthermore Infineon’s next generation BiCMOS technology B11HFC with f T of 250 GHz and f max of 370 GHz is described. In addition, significant improvements of the cut-off frequencies can be achieved by replacing the currently used double poly self-aligned configuration by a more advanced SiGe HBT architecture like IHP’s transistor module with selective base link epitaxy. The capability of this transistor cell for future BiCMOS generations was demonstrated by integrating it into Infineon’s 130nm CMOS process. A transistor performance with f max of 500GHz was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207