MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243021720 · doi:10.15695/amqst.v1i1.8

In Quest of Nuestras Américas

2004· article· es· W4243021720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Earl E. Fitz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmeriQuests · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesLIDAIndigenousPolitical scienceArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fitz outlines and defines Inter-American Studies as an emergent field and examines the profound effect it is already having on a great variety of disciplines, from literature to law, and from music to medicine. He argues that Inter-American Studies provides a solid methodological basis for the comparative study of the nations and cultures of the Americas: indigenous peoples, past and present; English and French-speaking Canada; the United States, Spanish America, Brazil, and the Caribbean. Fitz perfila y define estudios interamericanos como una disciplina emergente y examina el efecto profundo que ya tiene sobre una gran variedad de disciplinas, desde la literatura a la ley, y de la música a la medicina. Él argumenta que los estudios interamericanos proporcionan una base sólida metodológica para el estudio comparativo de las naciones y las culturas de América: nuestros pueblos indígenas, del pasado y del presente; el Canadá de habla inglés y francés; los Estados Unidos, la América Hispana, el Brasil, y el Caribe. Fitz esboça e define Estudos Inter-Americanos como uma especialidade emergente e examina o efeito profundo que já tem sobre uma grande variedade de disciplinas, desde a literatura ao direito, e da música à medicina. Ele argumenta que Estudos Inter-Americanos provêm uma base sólida da metodologia para estudos comparativos das nações e culturas da América: nossos povos indígenas, do passado e da presente; a Canada que fala francês e a que fala inglês; os Estados Unidos, a América Hispânica, o Brasil e o Caribe. Fitz dresse le portrait des « études inter-américaines », les définit comme un domaine d’études nouveau et examine son influence profonde sur un grand nombre de disciplines, allant de la littérature au droit, ou de la musique à la médecine. Il affirme que les études inter-américaines offrent une base méthodologique solide pour l’étude comparative des nations et cultures du continent américain: nos peuples indigènes d’hier et d’aujourd’hui ; le Canada anglophone et francophone ; les Etats-Unis, l’Amérique hispanique et le Brésil, et les Caraïbes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmeriQuestsSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207