MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243078909 · doi:10.14283/jnhrs.2015.17

SAFETY EVALUATION OF FLAXSEED LIGNAN SUPPLEMENTATION IN OLDER ADULTS RESIDING IN LONG-TERM CARE HOMES

2015· article· en· W4243078909 on OpenAlexaff
N. Viveky, L. Thorpe, J. Alcorn, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, S.J Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Nursing Home Research Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLignanLong-term careMedicineTerm (time)GerontologyTraditional medicineNursingChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties of flaxseed lignans could benefit age-related chronic conditions.We aimed to examine the safety of supplementation of the major flaxseed lignan, secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) in frail older adults residing in long-term care (LTC) homes.Twentysix older adults (60-80 years of age) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in a double blind randomized control trial of SDG supplementation at 300 mg/day for six months.Adverse events were recorded every week along with other blood and functionality tests.Participants in the treatment group demonstrated no evidence of hypoglycemia and hypotension or other adverse events.We conclude that SDG supplementation (300 mg/day) in a frail, complex patient population causes no significant adverse outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.608
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Nursing Home Research SciencesSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207