Altered timing of the extracellular‐matrix‐mediated epithelial‐mesenchymal interaction that initiates mandibular skeletogenesis in three inbred strains of mice: Development, heterochrony, and evolutionary change in morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Subtle changes in embryonic development are a source of significant morphological alterations during evolution. The mammalian mandibular skeleton, which originates from the cranial neural crest, is a complex structure comprising several components that interact late in embryogenesis to produce a single functional unit. It provides a model system in which individual developmental events at the basis of population‐level evolutionary change can be investigated experimentally. Inbred mouse strains exhibit obvious morphological differences despite the relatively short time since their divergence from one another. Some of these differences can be traced to small changes in the timing of early developmental events such as the formation of the cellular condensations that initiate skeletogenesis. This paper examines an even earlier event for changes in timing, the epithelial‐mesenchymal interaction(s) required to initiate chondrogenesis of Meckel’s cartilage and osteogenesis of the dentary bone. Using three inbred strains of mice (CBA, C3H and C57) we found that, within each strain, cartilage and bone are induced at the same time and by the same (mandibular) epithelium, that chondrogenesis and osteogenesis are initiated by a matrix‐mediated epithelial‐mesenchymal interaction, and that timing of the interactions differs among the three inbred strains. These results are discussed with respect to the possible molecular basis of such temporal shifts in inductive interactions and how such studies can be used to shed light on heterochrony as a mechanism of evolutionary change in morphology. J. Exp. Zool. 291:258–273, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".