MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relationships between Microstructural Parameters and Time-Dependent Mechanical Properties of a New Nickel Based Superalloy AD730™

2016· article· en· W4243121890 on OpenAlexaff
J. Cormier, C. Crozet, A. Devaux, J. Franchet, F. Hamon, A. Organista, A. Rouffié, L. Thébaud, P. Villechaise

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperalloyMaterials scienceNickelMetallurgyMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High temperature viscoplastic properties of the new nickel-based superalloy AD730 TM have been investigated, under creep and dwell-fatigue loading conditions.The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of several microstructural parameters on these properties.Three microstructures have then been tested in creep and dwell-fatigue, at 700 °C and 850 °C: a Fine Grain microstructure, a Coarse Grain one and a Single Crystalline microstructure.The creep-controlling parameters at 850 °C are the grain size and intragranular γ′ volume fraction, whereas at 700 °C, these controlling parameters depend on the applied stress.Indeed, depending on the applied stress, changes of creep deformation mechanisms have been evidenced for both the Fine and Coarse Grain microstructures.Dwell-fatigue tests revealed that depending on the applied stress, the influence of the unloading phase may have a beneficial impact on the overall behavior.An attempt is proposed to explain this phenomenon, by highlighting the appearance of a "negative plastic deformation" occurring during the unloading phase in dwellfatigue tests at high maximum applied stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207