Objets ethnographiques associés aux Inuit du Labrador exhibés en Europe en 1880
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’été 1880, huit Inuit du nord du Labrador acceptent de partir pour l’Europe où, contre rémunération, ils exhiberont leurs personnes et leur culture devant le public de grandes villes. Leur recruteur, le Norvégien Johan Adrian Jacobsen, profite de son séjour à Hebron et dans le fjord de Nachvak pour recueillir dans les sépultures une collection d’artefacts qu’il expose avec les Inuit. Malheureusement, aucun des Inuit ne reverra sa terre natale, le groupe ayant été anéanti par la variole moins de quatre mois après son arrivée en Europe. En 2014, la publication du livre Sur les traces d’Abraham Ulrikab dévoile la présence, dans les collections de musées français et allemands, non seulement des restes humains des Inuit, mais aussi d’un ensemble d’artefacts assemblé par Jacobsen, ainsi que de divers objets ayant appartenus aux Inuit. Ce texte vise à actualiser la nature des objets, l’historique de leur collecte et leur acquisition par les musées européens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".