MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243137496 · doi:10.1109/tiv.2020.2973014

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

2020· article· en· W4243137496 on OpenAlex
Ümi̇t Özgüner, Tankut Acarman, Matthew Barth, Christian Laugier, Stéphanie Lefèvre, Danil Prokhorov, Christoph Stiller, Mohan M. Trivedi, Martin R. Adams, Matthias Althoff, Onur Altintas, Nabil Aouf, Wen‐Hua Chen, Antonella Ferrara, Kikuo Fujimura, Roy Goudy, Naohisa Hashimoto, Zhencheng Hu, Javier Ibañez‐Guzmán, H Gi, Jung Pardis Khayyer, Jean-Philippe Lauffenburger, Massimiliano Lenardi, Lingxi Li, Andreas A. Malikopoulos, Fawzi Nashashibi, Sergiu Nedevschi, Urbano Nunes, Simona Onori, F. Özgüner, Kazuya Takeda, Ming Yang, Yilu Zhang, Huijing Zhao, Ceylan Ozguner, Thomas Siegert, Julie Cozin, Corporate Governance, Donna Hourican, Jamie Moesch, Educational Activities, Sophia Muirhead, Liesel Bell, Chris Brantley, Cherif Amirat, Karen Hawkins, Cecelia Jankowski, Konstantinos Karachalios, Standards Association, Mary Ward-Callan, Stephen Welby, Dawn Melley, Kevin Lisankie, Peter Tuohy, Jeffrey Cichocki, Neelam Khinvasara, Patrick Kempf, George Criscione, Toshio Fukuda, Susan Kathy, Land, Kathleen Kramer, Joseph Lillie, José Luis Moura, Stephen Phillips, Tapan K. Sarkar, Kukjin Chun, Robert Fish, Kazuhiro Kosuge, James Conrad, Ljiljana Trajković

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsOZ Optics (Canada)Canadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (T-IV) publishes peer-reviewed articles that provide innovative research concepts and application results, report significant theoretical findings and application case studies, and raise awareness of pressing research and application challenges in areas of intelligent vehicles in a roadway environment, and in particular in automated and vehicles. The T-IV focuses on providing critical information to the intelligent vehicle community, serving as a dissemination vehicle for IEEE ITS Society members and the others to learn the state of the art development and progress on research and applications in the field of intelligent vehicles. Member copies are for personal use only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it