A fast Design Space Exploration Based on Priority Factor for a Multi Parametric Optimized High Level Synthesis Design Flow
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis introduces a novel approach to rapid Design Space Exploration (DSE) and presents a formalized High Level Synthesis (HLS) design flow with multi parametric optimization issues related to DSE such as the precision of evaluation, time exhausted during evaluation and also automation of the exploration process. During DSE a conflicting situation always exists for the designer to concurrently maximize the accuracy of the exploration process and minimize the time spent during DSE analysis. This technique is capable of drastically reducing the number of architectural variants to be analyzed for accurate selection of the optimal design point in a short time. The DSE results for many benchmarks are presented along with a comparison to an existing DSE approach that uses the hierarchical structure method for architecture evaluation. Results indicated significant improvement in speedup compared to the current existing approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it