Bibliographic record
Abstract
Western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) trees in western Montana, U.S.A., were monitored for 6 years following pruning to assess incidence of epicormic sprouting. Trees were pruned to either 2.4 or 5.5 m. Epicormic sprouts were more prevalent in smaller diameter trees and in trees pruned to shorter live crown lengths than larger or longer crowned trees. Number of sprouts declined since pruning, but over 30% of trees still had epicormic sprouts 6 years after pruning. Sprouts that did not extend from the bole were prone to becoming dormant or dying over time. Extended sprouts were more persistent and will probably form wood-quality defects that remain outside the defect core. Pruning of western larch may still be successful for enhancing clearwood production if trees are pruned to retain at least a 50% live crown ratio and if pruning is delayed until trees reach about 16 cm diameter at breast height for a short pruning lift (2.4 m) or 22 cm for a higher pruning lift (5.5 m).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".