Bibliographic record
Abstract
Richard Bosworth describes Italy in 1914 as “the Least of the Great Powers.” Italy's allies, Austria-Hungary and Germany, paid it scant attention that July. They excluded Rome from policy discussions in the aftermath of the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Nor did they inform the Italians of the terms of the ultimatum Vienna handed Belgrade on 23 July. During the crisis, neither Austria-Hungary nor Germany treated Italy as a valued ally, and much less as a great power. Italy's first response to the war was a declaration of neutrality on 3 August 1914. That decision was largely the work of Foreign Minister Antonio di San Giuliano. Italy at that point was the Continent's largest neutral nation. Both sides in the struggle, accordingly, competed for its support, encouraging either continued neutrality or active participation. Italy's leaders welcomed these offers and for some nine months prepared for combat and weighed the options. This period, called the intervento , ended with the second response, the decision to enter the war on the side of Britain and France in May 1915. War Powers Italy was governed according to the Sardinian constitution of 1848. Article 3 of that document declared that the legislative power was to be “exercised collectively by the King and the two Chambers, the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies.” But other articles assured royal dominance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.157 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".