MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243238521 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-12239

Parametric Modeling of EM Behaviors of Microwave Components Using Combined Neural Networks and Pole-Residue Transfer Functions

2017· dissertation· en· W4243238521 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Feng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersTianjin University
KeywordsParametric statisticsTransfer functionParametric modelArtificial neural networkMicrowaveSensitivity (control systems)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parametric modeling of electromagnetic (EM) behaviors has become important for EM design optimizations of microwave components.The EM based design, such as design optimization, what if analysis and yield-driven design, can be time consuming because it usually requires repetitive EM simulations with varying values of geometrical parameters as design variables.Parametric models can be developed from the information of EM responses as functions of geometrical parameters.The developed parametric models allow faster simulations and optimizations with varying values of geometrical parameters and subsequently can be implemented in high-level circuit and system design optimizations.This thesis proposes a novel technique to develop combined neural network and pole-residue-based transfer function models for parametric modeling of EM behaviors of microwave components.In this technique, neural networks are trained to learn the relationships between pole/residues of the transfer functions and geometrical parameters.The orders of the pole-residue transfer functions may vary over different regions of geometrical parameters.We develop a pole-residue tracking technique to solve this order-changing problem.After the proposed modeling process, the trained model can be used to provide accurate and fast predictions of the EM behavior of microwave components with geometrical parameters as variables.An advanced pole-residue tracking technique is proposed to exploit sensitivity information to solve the challenges of pole-residue tracking especially when the amount of training data are reduced and/or the geometrical step sizes between the data samples are enlarged.The proposed technique takes advantages of sensitivity i information to split one pole into two separate new poles to achieve the increase of the orders of the transfer functions and ultimately form transfer functions of a constant order over the entire region of geometrical parameters.The proposed technique addresses the challenges of pole-residue tracking when training data are limited.As a further advancement, we introduce EM sensitivity analysis into the poleresidue-based neuro-transfer function modeling technique.The purpose is to increase the model accuracy by utilizing EM sensitivity information and to speedup the model development process by reducing the number of training data required for developing the model.The proposed parametric model consists of the original and adjoint pole-residue based neuro-TF models.New formulations are derived for calculating the second order derivatives for training the adjoint pole-residue based neuro-TF model.By exploiting the sensitivity information, the proposed technique can further speed up the model development process over the existing pole-residue parametric modeling method without using sensitivity analysis.The proposed parametric modeling techniques in this thesis are demonstrated by several microwave examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→